Updated: Reading List in Progress

by Dan on December 12, 2009

I’ve added a Bibliography page where I occasionally will upload a reading list and books of interest in the Personal Brain format. The Brain folks provide a service — still in beta — called WebBrain, where PBers can share Brains they’ve created. From there you can copy code to embed in a Web site or on a blog, which is what I’ve done here. (My initial upload of Bibliography linked to a web server is still out there, but not here. I like the embedded Brain better.)

So, if interested, click on the Bibliography tab above, then kick the tires of the Bibliography Brain. I’ll be adding links and intelligence as I can.

{ 0 comments }

nook smallI finally got a hold of Barnes & Noble’s new eBook reader, Nook, the other day in the store. I am somewhat of an eBook junkie.

I own a second-generation Sony Reader.

I own a second-generation Kindle.

I used to read so-called eBooks on Palm Pilots and other PDAs (I know, that’s sick).

I am trying to decide if I want to buy the Nook because, as I like to rant, no one company has figured out the eBook device and maybe Barnes & Noble has done it.

After my brief study of the Nook, my gut-reaction answer is: no, not yet.

The Nook feels good in the hand. It’s about the size of Kindle 2.0, although a tad bit heavier, which I like. The design isn’t as sexy as the Sony Reader, but it’s better than both Kindles. The top three-quarters of the screen functions like any eBook reader, using eInk to simulate reading a printed page. However, the refresh rate (which takes getting used to on any device) is slow and flickering, which simply could be a result of the Nook being pre-production.

The bottom quarter of the Nook is where Barnes & Noble differs from Sony and Amazon. It’s color and touch screen, so a reader can swipe through book-cover thumbnails or access the device’s menu structure. Sorry to say, the touch screen was sluggish and the overall user interface wasn’t as intuitive as expected. In fact, annotating text — something I really, really, really want — isn’t as good as Kindle 2.0’s boxy navigation nub and undersized chicklet keyboard.

But as they say in the world of books, you can’t judge one by its cover, so I’ll wait and see what Barnes & Noble delivers in January.

{ 0 comments }

Pruning

by Dan on December 10, 2009

pruning editIt’s been a very, very long semester, so I did little writing here, opting instead to stay ahead of smart kids and get four lectures done a week. All in all, I worked with about 180-odd students.

I opted this semester to use a unique collaboration site, known to us in three classes as Class Notebook (I worked with the developer directly for a tailored solution), rather than use a custom blog or wiki, a paid-for wiki, a Ning-like social site, a Facebook group page, a Friend Feed account, or a specific Twitter feed. I’ve tried them all over the years, and they each have their own advantages and disadvantages. In the end, nothing really does what I want to do, so I opted for something completely different. Besides the overall look and feel not being what I want (it was a beta test, to be fair), I liked using Class Notebook and will use it again — but more on this later.

With this in mind, I am returning to my own sick self and pruning lots of posts about students and the University. I know deleting posts is a big no-no in the world of blogging, but, really, who cares? Most of the time I was simply communicating to students about assignments and providing a few resources, which have grown outdated and everything looks fragmented. And to be honest, mixing the two didn’t allow me to say what I want to say.

Enough said.

{ 0 comments }

If you are interested, here is an iPod-ready MP3 of the discussion on the Diane Rehm show on the fate of the newspaper industry (May 6). Only caught the tail-end, so I need to go back and review later today.

I find it interesting that Rehm and guests are talking about the fate of newspapers — and the influence of new technology on the industry — and her own show is only available to listen to via streaming audio. So ’90s.

I hate being forced to sit in front of the computer to listen to a Real Audio or Windows Media files, or buying a transcript or CD for $30 a pop. A CD, really? Most NPR shows are available as podcasts, which are great for on-the-go listening.

The Fate of the Newspaper Industry MP3. Right-click to download.

{ 1 comment }

Larger eBook reader from Plastic Logic

Larger eBook reader from Plastic Logic

For all the hubub about the Kindle eBook reader getting a larger display and how this might save the print industry, none of it will matter if makers of these products do not re-imagine and re-tool the reading experience for the digital age.

As Brad Stone noted in today’s New York Times, “These new gadgets, with screens roughly the size of a standard sheet of paper, could present much of the editorial content and advertising content of traditional periodicals in generally the same format as they appear in print.” (My italics.)

It’s also widely reported that newspaper organizations (like Hearst) are looking for newfangled devices that accurately translate the printed form to digital, allowing newspapers and magazines to shift to a high-tech distribution system — which, by the way, lack-of-visionaries from both industries hope people will pay for. Some believe that a larger Kindle will save the textbook industry.

Typical of technologists and the thirst to solve problems with newer, bigger, better technology, the savior for print won’t be a larger display, or even a color one. It will be coming up with a digital reading experience that allows people to read newspapers, periodicals, books, and textbooks like they do now, only in ways more appropriate for the digital age.

After all, the act of reading is behavioral and ritualistic, and user interfaces for eBook readers like the Kindle pay little attention to how people actually read.

In reading the newspaper, people often separate the sections they want to read from those they don’t care about. Then they take the pile they want to read and subdivide it even more, eventually settling on what they want to read now, what they hope to read soon, and what they are saving for later if they get the time.

While newspapers on the Kindle do allow readers to jump from section to section and to see a list of stories, the “paper” on an electronic device is still jump-from-one-link-to-the-next. Saving an article to read for later, or adding it to a group of stories for ongoing research, is impossible.

The same goes for books and other printed material. I can jump to chapters, sections, and bookmarks while reading on the Kindle, but it’s still not a true browsing experience. I cannot easily “thumb through” an electronic book.

Solving the act of reading a newspaper or book is just one step toward innovating the electronic reading experience. The digital age allows us to share what we read much easier with family, friends, the world. Back in the day (insert old-timer’s voice), to share an article you had to cut it out, hand deliver it, mail it, or copy and fax it.

Today newspapers and magazines have taken strides for sharing information by adding link buttons for Facebook, Digg, Twitter, or email, but these are baby steps. It’s not even possible to share what you read on the Kindle — and I’m not talking the source article or book and digital rights management.

Annotation is in its infancy on the Kindle. I can highlight passages, add text, or bookmark a page, but these are saved in a single text file on the Kindle. I must connect the device to a computer to retrieve my notes, which is a pain because I get highlights from Outliers mixed in with marks from Brain Rules and clippings from the NYT.

At this time no eBook device allows people to read newspapers, periodicals, and books the way they want to read them and to do with the information what they want. Until the reading experience is re-imagined and re-tooled for a digital age, putting a larger display on a Kindle won’t save the newspaper, magazine, or textbook industries.

Or attract the masses to electronic readers.

{ 0 comments }

Irony, Winer & Rosen

by Dan on April 23, 2009

Dave Winer

Dave Winer

The irony isn’t lost on me. I tell the students about the need to consistently post to their blogs and that speed is of the essence in new media — and then it takes me a month to update.

The semester is almost over, and I am anxious to get back behind the keyboard. For now, the 140 characters of Twitter have been a Godsend. I’ve posted quite a few links for journalism and the newspaper industry and I encourage you to check them out, if you are interested in the topic.

I am enjoying the Rebooting the News podcast that Dave Winer is doing with NYU journalism professor Jay Rosen. Winer also started a FriendFeed room for Rebooting The News that’s worth joining. (Also follow Winer and Rosen on Twitter).

Winer is an opinionated, curmudgeonly character who, in addition to his popular blog Scripting News, occasionally produces a podcast called Morning Coffee Notes. The production value is often poor, but I really don’t care. Winer rewards you for time spent with quality content, deep insight, opinion, perspective, and a technology voice who speaks from experience. He knows what he is talking about, unlike so many so-called new media experts and commentators these days.

This is refreshing. I sense a trend in new media technology shows that’s exasperating. Many of these programs, including the dearly loved This Week in Technology and Steve Gillmor’s Gillmor Gang, are getting too chummy. The hosts and guests spend more time yucking it up than they do presenting technology news and analysis, which is the value they bring to their listeners.

As much as I love Leo Laporate — and he’s certainly a respected new-media pioneer — it was painful listening to him titter like a schoolgirl with guests Lisa Bettany and Shira Lazar on the most recent episode of TWiT (#191). But this is a topic for another time.

Suffice to say, Winer and Rosen don’t pander. They exchange a few pleasantries, reference a couple of past experiences, and get to the subject at hand.

Like I need to.

{ 0 comments }

Taking the Kindle 2 plunge

by Dan on March 23, 2009

Kindle 2's design is much improved

Kindle 2's design is much improved

I finally broke down and bought a Kindle 2 eBook reader from Amazon.

It helped, of course, that I had leftover gift certificates from Amazon, so the price was a bit more palatable. Even so, this is a big change for me.

I hated the first Kindle.

It was ugly, felt plastic-y in my hands, and the user interfaced — there’s no other way to say it — sucked. Nevermind that I could buy books without a computer using Amazon’s Whispernet. The hardware had to improve before I’d jump on the Kindle bandwagon.

(See a few post from my days writing for the digital lifestyle blog last100: Despite recent interest, eBook readers have a long way to go and Kindle 2.0 is looking more like Kindle 1.5.)

So why the change?

The Kindle 2’s hardware has greatly improved. It feels solid, less plastic-y, and is well-balanced in my hand. I no longer accidentally turn pages through poorly designed buttons. The hard interface on the front of the reader is well placed, well spaced, and reasonably easy to navigate.

I try not to be swayed by the A-Lister techies like Leo Laporte (of This Week in Technology fame), but he and others make a good case for the improved Kindle 2. Leo thinks the Kindle 2 will do for print what the iPod did for music. (See also Jacob Weisberg’s post How the Kindle Will Change the World at Slate.)

My brother-in-law loves his Kindle, and he has the first edition.

The annotation tools, while far from perfect, seem better with the Kindle 2 and helped me make the decision. I’m tired of buying heavy, costly books to mark up and file on a shelf. I want to use the information. I’m not sure the Kindle 2 the perfect solution yet, but I can only hope that interface designers are studying how people read books and what they do with them while they read for future improvements. [click to continue…]

{ 1 comment }

What is Your Blog?

by Dan on February 23, 2009

A prospective student reports about a recent job interview:

I just had an interview and the third question they sent me is what is your blog? Straight up! And I’m in sales.

{ 2 comments }

Andrew Sullivan on Why He Blogs

by Dan on February 10, 2009

I confess. I have a blogger crush. Sort of. Meet Andrew Sullivan.

Sullivan, author of the popular Daily Dish, blogs and writes for The Atlantic. One thing I like about him: He boasts of being of no party or clique. In the November 2008 issue of the magazine, Sullivan tells us why he blogs, an interesting read, one which you will undertake.

Blogging is to writing what extreme sports are to athletics: more free-form, more accident-prone, less formal, more alive. Blogging is writing out loud.

Nicely put. the-atlantic-online-november-2008-why-i-blog-andrew-sullivan

{ 1 comment }

ted_logoI tweeted this today but wanted to bring it to the attention of students who do not read Twitter. Check out the article in The New York Times on the TED Conference. Virginia Heffernan, a self confessed TED addict, discusses what TED is, the video of TED, and why she’s so addicted to watching short speeches by its participants.

Count me among the obsessed.

TED is a great example of what I love about podcasting, new media, and social networks from a practical point of view. Most of us will never be invited to speak, or participate, at the highly prestigious and expensive TED Conference, an annual event that brings together today’s most interesting people and brightest thinkers in all disciplines.

Yet through podcasting and new media, I am able to see highlights of TED presentations and be exposed to thinking and ideas  that  I wouldn’t normally have access to. All that’s missing is the social hobnobbing, between presentations hallway talk, and expensive dinners at day’s end.

It’s worth your time — and much cheaper — to investigate TED via the Web and iTunes.

A side note: While you can access TED videos through a desktop or laptop computer (duh), there are two other access points I really like — the AppleTV and iPhone. Both use iTunes to allow you to download TED videos, either to your television for laid-back viewing on the sofa or to the phone for on-the-go consumption. The iPhone is particularly nice because you can download a new video as long as you have access to Wi-Fi, although the search function could be better implemented.

There are about 370 TED videos, and I am far from seeing all of them. Do you have any favorites that you recommend?

{ 0 comments }